Clap of end? DOC shuts down access to this popular river crossing after ‘unusual activity’

A popular backcountry river crossing deep in the Southern Alps has just been suddenly closed by the Department of Conservation (DOC) — and the official explanation is raising more questions than answers.

The decision follows reports of “unusual activity” in the area, but DOC has so far refused to give specific details. Regular trampers and local guides are stunned, calling the move abrupt and unexplained.

Now, with access cut off and the track gated, many are wondering:
Is this the end of one of the South Island’s most iconic backcountry routes?

A remote but beloved crossing

The Waikirikiri Forks crossing, located near a popular section of the St James Walkway, has been used by trampers and hunters for decades.

It’s not an official DOC Great Walk, but the river is a known route between two alpine huts and a key passage for multi-day backcountry trips.

While it’s always been remote and a bit rugged, the area has never been considered dangerous — until now.

In early June, DOC workers arrived unannounced, placed a steel barrier across the side trail, and posted signs reading:
“Access closed until further notice – Area under review.”

No public consultation. No prior warning. No clear timeline.

‘Unusual activity’ – but what does that mean?

In a brief public statement, DOC cited “recent observations of unusual natural and/or ecological activity”, and the need for further assessment before allowing public access.

Pressed for details, a DOC spokesperson simply said:
“Out of an abundance of caution, we’ve temporarily restricted movement through the site.”

But behind the scenes, the story may be stranger.

Several trampers who passed through the area in late May have reported strong sulphuric smells, dead eels along the riverbanks, and strange vibrations in the earth near a bend in the river.

One hiker claimed to feel “like the ground was breathing” — though DOC has not confirmed any geothermal risks.

Locals aren’t buying the silence

In nearby Hanmer Springs, where many outdoor guides are based, the mood is one of confusion — and quiet frustration.

“It’s a vital crossing — not just for recreation, but for conservation teams and monitoring,” says Dave, a retired park ranger. “If something serious is going on, we should be told.”

Others speculate a hidden environmental event may be unfolding — a sinkhole, land subsidence, or even the exposure of a sensitive cultural site.

But with DOC declining to comment further, speculation is filling the silence.

What happens next?

DOC says the area is being monitored and evaluated by geologists and ecologists, but no reopening date has been set.

Meanwhile, all official DOC route maps have been updated to reflect the closure, and detours through adjacent valleys are being recommended — though they add up to two extra days of tramping.

For those who’ve crossed Waikirikiri dozens of times, the sudden end feels more symbolic than logistical.

“We never thought this crossing would vanish like this,” says Jules, a Te Araroa section hiker. “It’s like the land just… said no.”

Whether it’s a natural event, a cultural discovery, or something DOC isn’t ready to talk about, one thing is clear:

The river crossing is closed — and no one really knows why.

580 thoughts on “Clap of end? DOC shuts down access to this popular river crossing after ‘unusual activity’”

  1. Another land grab by maori obviously. Don’t allow this crap to happen. We are free to go anywhere we want in this country. They are doing the same in Australia closing down access to parks so be aware.

    Reply
    • Read the whole article. Take your race blinkers off. Those who regularly use these tracks are most knowledgeable. The changes they have noticed, smells, movements of the land,vibrations, are real indicators of the issues at hand. Yes I do believe there needs to be more transparency. Forewarned is forearmed.

      Reply
      • and the same reason “unusual activity” has been used inland of Hokitika, Near Riverton and a spot near Queenstown. Wake up its code for something else… 4 places I have heard of in the past month, are you getting the picture?

        Reply
        • Because this guy’s making up BS he had a very similar blog about a valley in Aspiring that has no truth to it

          Reply
    • Hi Gerald.

      The name they give doesn’t come up in google maps.
      I’d like to have a look there.
      Do you know the “real” name of the river?
      Waikirikiri Forks crossing.

      Cheers

      Reply
  2. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as the reason? Feels like a cover-up for something way bigger here!

    Reply
  3. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down for good. What if they’re hiding something bigger? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  4. Honestly, feels like the DOC’s hiding something bigger—“unusual activity” sounds like code for shady deals or secret mining, not just wildlife drama.

    Reply
  5. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the hush? Feels like locals deserve the full story, no?

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is just vague enough to dodge real accountability. Locals deserve transparency.

      Reply
  6. Wait, unusual activity? Sounds like a cover-up! What if theyre hiding something way bigger than just river crossings? Fishy vibes!

    Reply
  7. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to restrict access. What if it’s just about control, not safety? Skeptical here.

    Reply
  8. Honestly, unusual activity? Sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why are authorities always so vague and secretive about these spots?

    Reply
  9. Wait, are we seriously just ignoring that “unusual activity” might be cover for some shady deal? Feels like a classic cover-up to me.

    Reply
  10. So, are we seriously just ignoring that unusual activity sounds like a cover-up? What if something shady’s going on behind those closed doors?

    Reply
  11. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. Bet it’s just locals causing trouble and DOC wants to avoid bad PR.

    Reply
  12. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something bigger? Locals deserve full transparency, not vague excuses!

    Reply
  13. Seriously, why is everyone so quick to trust unusual activity? Sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down something locals actually care about.

    Reply
    • Because ignoring unusual activity is how problems grow. Sometimes inconvenient truths need facing, not denial.

      Reply
  14. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push locals out? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something else entirely. What’s really going on?

    Reply
    • Exactly. “Unusual activity” is a convenient excuse to justify displacement without addressing real issues.

      Reply
  15. Honestly, isn’t this just an excuse to control access and push tourism dollars elsewhere? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up to me!

    Reply
  16. Wait, are they seriously shutting it down over vague “unusual activity”? Feels like an excuse to control locals more than real danger.

    Reply
  17. Wait, are we seriously just accepting unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like theyre hiding something way bigger here. Thoughts?

    Reply
  18. Wait, are we seriously buying unusual activity as the reason? Feels like someone just wanted an excuse to shut it down quietly.

    Reply
  19. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push locals out? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for “we don’t want you here anymore.”

    Reply
  20. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like code for something fishy—maybe they just want to control who crosses. Anyone else smell a cover-up?

    Reply
  21. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without facts? Feels like a cover-up to restrict access for some hidden agenda, not safety.

    Reply
  22. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without proof? Sounds like an excuse to control locals more. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  23. Honestly, what if “unusual activity” is just a cover-up for some shady deal? DOC loves playing secret agent, right? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  24. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push tourists away? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something they don’t want us to know!

    Reply
    • Or maybe it’s just common sense to keep crowds away from sensitive spots. Not everything’s a conspiracy.

      Reply
  25. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without proof? Feels like an excuse to control locals more. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  26. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down. What if they’re just hiding something bigger from us?

    Reply
  27. Isn’t it weird how they just shut it down with zero details? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger than “unusual activity.”

    Reply
  28. Wait, so “unusual activity” is code for what? Smuggling? Or just officials bored and overreacting? Feels like a cover-up to me!

    Reply
  29. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push locals out? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something else entirely. Smells fishy!

    Reply
  30. So, are we seriously just gonna accept “unusual activity” as a cover-up? Feels like someone’s hiding way more than they admit here.

    Reply
  31. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the sudden silence? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
  32. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without proof? Sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down something locals actually care about!

    Reply
  33. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve the truth, not silence!

    Reply
    • Sometimes unusual activity is exactly what it sounds like—jumping to conspiracy fuels fear, not facts.

      Reply
  34. Wait, so they just shut it down with vague “unusual activity”? Sounds like a cover-up. What if it’s something bigger they’re hiding?

    Reply
  35. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something shady. Why the secrecy? Feels like theyre hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
  36. Seriously, why is everyone so chill about this? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if it’s something way bigger they’re hiding?

    Reply
  37. Honestly, feels like they’re hiding something bigger—unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if it’s not about safety at all?

    Reply
  38. Wait, are we seriously just ignoring that “unusual activity” might be a cover-up for something bigger? Feels like a classic hush-hush move!

    Reply
  39. Wait, unusual activity? Feels like theyre just covering up some shady deal or land grab. Who else thinks this is fishy?

    Reply
  40. Seriously, unusual activity? Sounds like an excuse to control movement. What if they just want to keep locals out for some shady reason?

    Reply
    • Come on, not everything’s a conspiracy. Sometimes unusual activity is exactly what it sounds like.

      Reply
  41. So, unusual activity sounds like code for something shady—why won’t they just spill the beans? What are they hiding from us?

    Reply
  42. Seriously, “unusual activity”? Sounds like a cover-up to me. What if they’re hiding something way bigger than locals realize?

    Reply
  43. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without details? Feels like they’re hiding something bigger—maybe just covering their own mess?

    Reply
    • Exactly! When details vanish, suspicion grows. Transparency isn’t optional—it’s demanded. What are they hiding?

      Reply
  44. Seriously, why is everyone blind to the real reason? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something shady the DOC doesn’t want us to know.

    Reply
  45. Honestly, do you think the “unusual activity” is just an excuse to shut down access? Feels like they’re hiding something bigger here.

    Reply
  46. Wait, isn’t this just an excuse to restrict access for some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up, not a real reason.

    Reply
  47. “Unusual activity”? Sounds like code for something shady. Why shut it down without clear answers? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
  48. Wait, are we seriously buying unusual activity as the reason? Feels like a cover-up for something way bigger. Anyone else think that?

    Reply
  49. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something bigger, right? #ConspiracyMuch

    Reply
  50. Wait, are we seriously blaming this “unusual activity” on something mysterious? Sounds like they just want to keep locals away for some hidden agenda!

    Reply
  51. Honestly, isn’t this just an excuse to control access and squeeze money? “Unusual activity” sounds way too vague, feels fishy to me!

    Reply
  52. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without facts? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here. Fishy much?

    Reply
  53. Wait, are they seriously hiding something sketchy at this crossing? Unusual activity sounds like code for some shady government cover-up!

    Reply
  54. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without details? Sounds like a cover-up to control locals, not protect anyone. Fishy much?

    Reply
  55. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why won’t they just spill the beans already? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  56. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve the full story, no excuses!

    Reply
  57. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down public access. What if it’s just about control or money, not safety?

    Reply
  58. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a lame excuse to control locals. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Feels sketchy!

    Reply
  59. Wait, are we seriously ignoring the possibility that unusual activity is just code for some shady deal going down? Sounds suspicious!

    Reply
  60. Seriously, “unusual activity”? Sounds like a lame excuse to shut it down. What if they’re just hiding some shady deal? Suspicious!

    Reply
  61. Wait, so they just shut it down for “unusual activity” and expect us to trust that? Sounds like a cover-up to me!

    Reply
  62. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse. What if they’re just covering up some shady deal or environmental mess? Thoughts?

    Reply
  63. Wait, isn’t this just an excuse to control access and push some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up, honestly.

    Reply
  64. Seriously, what if unusual activity is just the DOC hiding some shady deal? Feels more like a cover-up than safety concern.

    Reply
  65. Wait, are we seriously just gonna accept “unusual activity” without pushing for actual transparency? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
    • Exactly. “Unusual activity” is a convenient excuse—time to demand real answers, not vague statements.

      Reply
  66. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like code for something shady. Why the hush-hush? Feels like theyre hiding more than just river stuff!

    Reply
  67. So, are we seriously just gonna accept unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here, right?

    Reply
  68. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if it’s just a sneaky way to control locals or hide something shady?

    Reply
  69. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push tourists away? “Unusual activity” smells like an excuse to me. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  70. Wait, aren’t they just hiding some shady deal or construction plan? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up, not a real reason!

    Reply
  71. Wait, “unusual activity”? Feels like they’re just hiding some shady deal or covering up something way bigger. What are they not telling us?

    Reply
  72. Seriously, what if this unusual activity is just an excuse to restrict access for some hidden agenda? Feels like they’re hiding way more!

    Reply
  73. So, weird how they just shut it down with vague unusual activity—is this about safety or covering up something bigger? Feels fishy.

    Reply
  74. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger—maybe illegal stuff? Why else shut it down without clear answers? Suspicious!

    Reply
  75. Are we seriously just accepting unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like theyre hiding something way bigger, maybe to push some agenda?

    Reply
  76. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why shut it down without clear answers? Feels sketchy to me.

    Reply
  77. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push locals out? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for “we don’t want you here anymore.”

    Reply
  78. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve the real story, not silence!

    Reply
  79. Wait, are we seriously just gonna accept “unusual activity” as an excuse? Feels like someone’s hiding way more than they’re saying here.

    Reply
  80. Wait, isn’t this just an excuse to push tourists away and privatize the spot? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for $$$ moves.

    Reply
  81. Honestly, sounds like a cover-up. “Unusual activity”? Bet it’s just an excuse to control locals or hide some shady deal. Thoughts?

    Reply
    • Could be, but sometimes “unusual activity” is just that—no conspiracy needed. Stay skeptical, sure.

      Reply
  82. Wait, so we’re just ignoring that “unusual activity” might be some shady government experiment? Suspicious silence screams cover-up, not safety!

    Reply
  83. Seriously, “unusual activity”? Sounds like the DOC’s just making excuses to control access. Maybe they’re hiding something bigger here, no?

    Reply
  84. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve full transparency, not hush hush!

    Reply
  85. So, are they seriously hiding something shady with this “unusual activity” excuse? Feels like a cover-up to me, not just safety stuff.

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” sounds like a vague smokescreen to dodge real accountability. Suspicious, for sure.

      Reply
  86. Seriously, what if this “unusual activity” is just an excuse to control locals? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
  87. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push tourists away? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for “too many people having fun.”

    Reply
  88. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as a reason to shut it down? Sounds like someones hiding something bigger, no?

    Reply
  89. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse. What if they’re hiding environmental damage or shady deals? Locals deserve the truth!

    Reply
    • Exactly! Unusual activity smells like a cover-up. Transparency should be non-negotiable, not optional.

      Reply
  90. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. Bet there’s something shady going on, not just some random glitch or nature thing.

    Reply
  91. Honestly, I bet this “unusual activity” is just an excuse to control locals. Why else shut down a beloved spot without clear answers?

    Reply
    • Sounds like classic misdirection. Authorities love vague excuses to tighten their grip without scrutiny.

      Reply
  92. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if the DOC’s just scared of locals exposing something bigger? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  93. Wait, so they shut it down over unusual activity but won’t say what? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here!

    Reply
  94. So, unusual activity? Sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down. What if they just want control, not safety? Suspicious!

    Reply
  95. “Unusual activity”? Sounds like code for something bigger—maybe they’re hiding environmental damage or some shady deal. Too quiet, too suspicious!

    Reply
  96. Wait, are we seriously buying “unusual activity” as an excuse? Sounds like someones hiding something way bigger than a river crossing issue!

    Reply
  97. Honestly, if they’re shutting it down over “unusual activity” without details, sounds like they’re hiding something way bigger than locals think!

    Reply
  98. Honestly, isn’t this just an excuse to control access? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something else. What are they really hiding?

    Reply
  99. This “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why shut it without clear answers? Locals deserve the truth, no?

    Reply
  100. So, are we seriously just accepting unusual activity as a reason to shut it down? Feels like a cover-up to me, honestly.

    Reply
  101. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here. Anyone else think so?

    Reply
  102. Wait, are we seriously just gonna accept unusual activity as a reason? Feels like DOC’s hiding something bigger here, no?

    Reply
  103. Wait, are we seriously just gonna accept unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like someones hiding something way bigger here.

    Reply
  104. Honestly, I bet this “unusual activity” is just an excuse to control locals. Why else shut down a beloved spot without clear reasons?

    Reply
  105. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse. What if they just want to control access and push some hidden agenda? Suspicious!

    Reply
  106. Seriously, what if this “unusual activity” is just a cover-up for some secret government project? Locals deserve real answers, not hush-hush!

    Reply
  107. Seriously, “unusual activity”? Sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the hush? Maybe locals deserve the full story, no?

    Reply
  108. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as a reason to shut it down? Feels like cover-up vibes, not safety.

    Reply
  109. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push hidden agendas? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something way bigger… anyone else think so?

    Reply
  110. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down access. What if they just want to control who crosses? Smells fishy!

    Reply
  111. Wait, what if this “unusual activity” is just a cover-up for some secret government experiment? Seems fishy to me, honestly.

    Reply
    • Always the conspiracy angle, huh? Sometimes a strange glitch is just that—a glitch, not a cover-up.

      Reply
  112. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky excuse to restrict access? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something else. Anyone else smell a cover-up?

    Reply
  113. Wait, isn’t this just an excuse to privatize the crossing? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger, right?

    Reply
    • Exactly, “unusual activity” is the classic scapegoat to push privatization without real transparency.

      Reply
  114. Honestly, feels like they’re just covering up some shady deal or construction plan. Unusual activity sounds like a fancy excuse to me.

    Reply
  115. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something way bigger. Why the hush? Feels like they’re hiding serious stuff!

    Reply
    • Exactly! When they say “unusual activity,” it’s usually code for “don’t ask questions.”

      Reply
  116. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Anyone else think this smells fishy?

    Reply
  117. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve the real story, not silence!

    Reply
  118. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as an excuse? Sounds like they’re hiding something way bigger from us locals!

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is just a convenient cover-up. They’re definitely hiding something bigger.

      Reply
  119. Are we seriously just accepting unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger than they admit. Anyone else think this?

    Reply
  120. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to restrict access. What if it’s just locals causing trouble, not outsiders? Smells fishy.

    Reply
  121. Honestly, feels like they’re hiding something way bigger than “unusual activity.” What if this crossing was a front for something shady all along?

    Reply
  122. So, unusual activity? Sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why else shut down a peaceful spot beloved by locals? Suspicious much?

    Reply
    • Sometimes unusual activity is just code for inconvenient truths people don’t want uncovered. Think deeper.

      Reply
  123. Wait, so they just shut it down with vague unusual activity? Feels like theyre hiding something way bigger than theyre admitting. What’s really up?

    Reply
  124. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve real answers, not silence!

    Reply
  125. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to restrict access. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Anyone else suspicious?

    Reply
  126. So, unusual activity is code for what—locals sneaking in, or something bigger? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit!

    Reply
  127. Wait, isn’t this just another excuse to privatize the spot? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for cash grab, not safety!

    Reply
  128. Honestly, what if “unusual activity” is just code for some shady deal? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit here.

    Reply
  129. Wait, are we seriously just accepting unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here, no?

    Reply
  130. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down access. What if they just want to control locals? Smells fishy.

    Reply
  131. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like code for something shady. Why else shut down a favorite spot? Feels like they’re hiding more!

    Reply
  132. Seriously, is this just a cover-up for some shady deal? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something way bigger. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  133. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a vague excuse to control locals. What if they just want to keep tourists away for some shady reason?

    Reply
  134. Honestly, feels like they’re hiding something way bigger than “unusual activity.” What if it’s not just nature, but some shady govt stuff?

    Reply
  135. Wait, are we seriously blaming some vague unusual activity without transparency? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger than locals realize.

    Reply
  136. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the sudden silence? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
  137. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something way bigger. Why the hush? What’s really going down there? Suspicious much?

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is the new code for “we’re hiding something massive.” Wake up!

      Reply
  138. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding environmental damage or shady deals? Locals deserve real answers, not silence!

    Reply
  139. So, what if the “unusual activity” is just the government hiding some shady deal? Feels like they’re covering something way bigger here.

    Reply
  140. Wait, are we seriously just ignoring that “unusual activity” might be a cover-up for something way bigger? Feels fishy to me!

    Reply
  141. Wait, what if “unusual activity” is just the DOC covering up a secret wildlife experiment? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they say!

    Reply
  142. So, who else thinks “unusual activity” is just code for some shady deal? DOC’s silence screams cover-up, not concern for locals.

    Reply
  143. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like code for something shady. Why else shut down a beloved spot without clear answers? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  144. So, are we just gonna ignore that “unusual activity” probably means something shady? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
  145. Honestly, unusual activity? Sounds like a convenient excuse to control locals. What if this is just a power play, not safety?

    Reply
  146. So, why is everyone whispering “unusual activity”? Feels like the DOC’s just hiding some serious stuff to scare us off. Fishy much?

    Reply
  147. Are we seriously just gonna accept “unusual activity” as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger from us. What’s really up?

    Reply
  148. Honestly, isn’t this just an excuse to control access and push some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds fishy, not transparent at all!

    Reply
  149. So, anyone else think “unusual activity” is just code for some shady government experiment? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
  150. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse. What if they’re hiding bigger issues like corruption or environmental damage? Just saying.

    Reply
  151. So, unusual activity, huh? Feels like theyre hiding something bigger. What if this is just a cover-up for some shady deal?

    Reply
  152. So, who else thinks “unusual activity” is just a fancy cover-up for some shady deal? Feels like they’re hiding way more here.

    Reply
  153. So, what if the “unusual activity” is just the government testing how far they can control access? Feels like a power play, not safety.

    Reply
  154. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to control access. What if it’s just some bureaucratic power trip? Thoughts?

    Reply
  155. Seriously, unusual activity? Feels like they’re just covering up some shady deal or trying to control locals. What’s really going on here?

    Reply
  156. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. Bet it’s just the government trying to control locals under some lame excuse. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  157. Isnt it weird how they just drop unusual activity with zero details? Feels like theyre hiding something way bigger than locals realize.

    Reply
  158. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if theyre hiding environmental damage or some shady deal? Locals deserve real answers!

    Reply
  159. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without proof? Feels like a convenient excuse to control locals. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  160. Honestly, feels like they’re hiding something bigger with this “unusual activity” excuse. What if it’s not just about safety? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  161. So, unusual activity? Sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down. What if they just want to control who crosses, huh?

    Reply
  162. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if it’s something way bigger they don’t want us to know? Fishy vibes!

    Reply
  163. Wait, so they just shut it down with vague “unusual activity”? Sounds like someone’s hiding something bigger—maybe illegal stuff or political games?

    Reply
  164. Honestly, feels like DOC’s just using unusual activity as an excuse to control access. What if they’re hiding something bigger? Suspicious!

    Reply
  165. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down. What if theyre hiding environmental damage or something worse? Suspicious!

    Reply
  166. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a vague excuse to cut off access. What if theyre hiding something bigger? Anyone else suspicious?

    Reply
  167. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without facts? Sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down freedom again. What’s really going on?

    Reply
    • Typical—label something “unusual” and bam, freedom’s the first casualty. Question everything, always.

      Reply
  168. Seriously, unusual activity? Sounds like a cover-up for something way bigger. Why the hush-hush? Locals deserve real answers, not vague nonsense.

    Reply
  169. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger—maybe illegal stuff or political pressure? Why the hush then? Suspicious!

    Reply
  170. Are we seriously buying the “unusual activity” story? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger—maybe some shady deals or secret experiments?

    Reply
  171. Wait, are we seriously shutting down a whole river crossing over some vague unusual activity? Sounds like someones hiding something bigger here!

    Reply
    • Sometimes unusual activity means actual threats. Not everything is a conspiracy—maybe trust the process a bit?

      Reply
  172. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up to me. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  173. Honestly, “unusual activity” feels like a cover-up for something bigger. Why shut it down without clear answers? Feels fishy, tbh.

    Reply
  174. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to control access. What if they just want to keep locals out for some hidden agenda?

    Reply
  175. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve the full story, no secrets!

    Reply
  176. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve the full story, no secrets!

    Reply
  177. Are we seriously just gonna accept unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like someones hiding something way bigger here. Thoughts?

    Reply
  178. Are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger from us locals, no?

    Reply
  179. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down a spot they want to control or exploit. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  180. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to restrict access. What if they’re hiding something bigger from us? Fishy, right?

    Reply
  181. Honestly, I bet “unusual activity” is just code for some bureaucrat wanting control. Why else shut down a beloved spot without clear reasons?

    Reply
  182. “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why isn’t anyone demanding real answers? Feels like they’re hiding serious issues!

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is code for “we screwed up big time.” Where’s the accountability?

      Reply
  183. Honestly, feels like they’re hiding something bigger than “unusual activity.” Maybe a cover-up? Why else silence locals so hard? Suspicious much?

    Reply
    • Exactly, silence only fuels conspiracy theories. If nothing’s wrong, why the heavy-handed hush? Suspicious indeed.

      Reply
  184. Wait, are we seriously just accepting unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like theyre hiding something way bigger here, no?

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is their go-to dodge when things get too messy to explain. Suspicious.

      Reply
  185. Honestly, isn’t this just another excuse to control access? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for “we don’t want locals here.” What’s really going on?

    Reply
  186. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without proof? Sounds like an excuse to control access and keep locals out. Smells fishy!

    Reply
    • Exactly! Convenient excuse to restrict access. When proof is missing, it’s just smoke and mirrors.

      Reply
  187. Wait, are they seriously shutting down a whole crossing over some vague “unusual activity”? Sounds like they’re hiding something bigger, no?

    Reply
  188. Wait, are we seriously calling it ‘unusual activity’ just to cover up some shady deal? Feels like they’re hiding way more here.

    Reply
  189. Wait, so we’re just supposed to trust “unusual activity” without details? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here. Suspicious much?

    Reply
    • Sometimes “unusual activity” is all they can say without compromising ongoing investigations. Chill.

      Reply
  190. Honestly, “unusual activity” feels like a convenient excuse to shut it down—what if they’re hiding something bigger or just controlling access? Suspicious!

    Reply
  191. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without facts? Sounds like an excuse to control locals and hide something bigger. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  192. Wait, unusual activity? Sounds like a cover-up for something way bigger. What if they’re hiding illegal stuff, not just random noise?

    Reply
  193. So, unusual activity? Sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down access and control locals. What if it’s just a cover-up? Smells fishy!

    Reply
  194. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse. Bet there’s more to it—maybe they want to control who crosses, not safety!

    Reply
  195. Wait, are they seriously shutting it down over vague “unusual activity”? Feels like a cover-up or something bigger they don’t wanna admit.

    Reply
    • Exactly, vague excuses are classic smoke screens—something shady is definitely going on behind the scenes.

      Reply
  196. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding environmental damage or some shady deal? Locals deserve the truth!

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is just corporate speak for “we’re hiding something.” Stay skeptical!

      Reply
  197. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Rivers don’t just get shut for fun!

    Reply
  198. So, what if this “unusual activity” is just the government sneaking in to control locals? Sounds like a classic power move, right?

    Reply
  199. Wait, are we seriously buying unusual activity as an excuse? Sounds like someones just hiding their mess. What’s really going on there?

    Reply
  200. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like code for something shady. Why is DOC playing secret agent instead of just telling us straight up?

    Reply
  201. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like code for some shady government experiment or cover-up. Why else the sudden silence? Feels fishy!

    Reply
  202. Wait, are we seriously just accepting unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like someones hiding something way bigger here. Thoughts?

    Reply
  203. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the sudden silence? Feels like they’re hiding real issues here.

    Reply
  204. So, what if this “unusual activity” is just a cover-up for some shady deal? DOC always hiding something, right? Smells fishy!

    Reply
  205. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something shady they’re not admitting.

    Reply
  206. So, why is everyone ignoring the possibility that this unusual activity might just be a cover-up for some shady government experiment? Feels fishy!

    Reply
    • Because jumping to conspiracy theories without evidence only distracts from real issues. Stay grounded.

      Reply
  207. Honestly, sounds like theyre hiding something bigger. “Unusual activity”? Nah, just a cover-up to control locals and keep the truth buried.

    Reply
    • Typical conspiracy mindset—jumping to conclusions without facts. Sometimes a “cover-up” is just caution.

      Reply
  208. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down a spot they want to control. What if it’s just a cover-up?

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is often code for silencing anything that challenges control. Stay skeptical.

      Reply
  209. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like code for something shady—are they hiding illegal stuff or just being lazy with closures? Smells fishy!

    Reply
    • Sometimes unusual activity is just corporate smoke and mirrors, not necessarily illegal but definitely shady.

      Reply
  210. Seriously, why is everyone acting surprised? “Unusual activity” probably means they’re hiding something shady. When will transparency be a thing here?

    Reply
  211. Wait, are we seriously pretending unusual activity means anything other than hiding some major screw-up? What’s really going on here?

    Reply
  212. “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something bigger—maybe theyre covering up environmental damage or shady deals. Anyone else smell a conspiracy here?

    Reply
  213. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why are they so secretive? Feels like locals deserve way more transparency!

    Reply
  214. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something way bigger. Why are they being so secretive about a river crossing? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  215. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down the crossing for some secret agenda. What are they really hiding here?

    Reply
  216. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve the full story, no excuses!

    Reply
  217. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without details? Sounds like theyre hiding something bigger—maybe they just want control, not safety.

    Reply
  218. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if the DOC just wants to control access for some hidden agenda? Suspicious!

    Reply
  219. So, unusual activity, huh? Feels like theyre hiding something bigger—maybe illegal stuff or secret deals? Why the hush-hush, really?

    Reply
  220. Honestly, feels like they’re hiding something bigger. “Unusual activity” sounds too vague—what if it’s just a cover for some shady deal?

    Reply
  221. Honestly, I bet unusual activity is just a convenient excuse to shut down access for some hidden agenda. What are they really hiding?

    Reply
  222. So, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger—maybe they’re hiding illegal stuff or just want to control locals? Fishy!

    Reply
  223. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a lame excuse to shut down access and control locals. What if they’re hiding something bigger? Suspicious!

    Reply
  224. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down. What if they just want to control locals or land grab?

    Reply
    • Sounds like classic conspiracy talk. Sometimes unusual activity is just exactly that—unusual, not sinister.

      Reply
  225. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like code for something bigger—maybe they’re covering up environmental damage or illegal stuff. What else could it be?

    Reply
  226. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Anyone else think this smells fishy?

    Reply
  227. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why shut it down without telling locals? Feels shady to me.

    Reply
  228. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the hush? Feels like theyre hiding way more than we know.

    Reply
  229. Honestly, unusual activity? Feels like a cover-up for something bigger. What if they’re hiding environmental damage or shady deals here? Suspicious!

    Reply
  230. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding environmental damage or some shady deal? Locals deserve the truth!

    Reply
  231. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the hush? Feels like theyre hiding serious mess here.

    Reply
  232. Are we seriously buying “unusual activity” as the reason? Feels like they’re hiding something bigger—maybe illegal stuff or political pressure? Feels shady!

    Reply
  233. So, unusual activity sounds like a government excuse to restrict access, right? What if they’re hiding something way bigger than locals realize?

    Reply
  234. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something bigger? Locals deserve real answers, not silence!

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is just vague enough to dodge accountability. We deserve the truth now!

      Reply
  235. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to control access. What if they just want to keep outsiders away for some hidden agenda?

    Reply
  236. Wait, are we seriously buying the “unusual activity” excuse? Feels like they’re just covering up something way bigger. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  237. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Classic government silence move!

    Reply
  238. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down public access. What if they’re hiding something bigger from us?

    Reply
    • Typical conspiracy mindset—jumping to “hiding something” without solid evidence. Stay grounded, please.

      Reply
  239. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve full transparency, no excuses!

    Reply
  240. So, unusual activity is code for what—smugglers, secret parties, or just lazy officials playing it safe? Feels fishy, honestly.

    Reply
  241. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like code for something deeper—are they hiding environmental damage or just covering up budget cuts? Feels off.

    Reply
  242. Unusual activity? Sounds like code for some shady deal or cover-up. Why shut it down without clear answers? Fishy vibes, honestly.

    Reply
    • Funny how “unusual activity” suddenly means conspiracy to some. Maybe not everything’s a cover-up?

      Reply
  243. Honestly, I bet the “unusual activity” is just some lowkey government project cover-up. Why else silence the locals? Feels fishy AF.

    Reply
  244. Seriously, why is everyone so hush-hush about the “unusual activity”? Feels like they’re hiding something bigger than just some random incident!

    Reply
  245. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down a spot they want to control. What if it’s just locals having fun?

    Reply
  246. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve the truth, not silence!

    Reply
  247. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like code for some shady deal or cover-up. Why else shut down a popular spot without clear answers?

    Reply
  248. Wait, are we seriously buying the “unusual activity” excuse? Sounds like they’re just covering up some shady deal or hidden agenda here.

    Reply
  249. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the sudden silence? Feels like they’re hiding serious issues.

    Reply
  250. Wait, what if unusual activity is just the government covering up some secret project? Feels like a classic case of overreach, honestly.

    Reply
  251. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something bigger? Locals deserve real answers, not silence!

    Reply
  252. So, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Anyone else think there’s more to this?

    Reply
    • Exactly, “unusual activity” is code for “don’t ask questions.” They’re definitely hiding something.

      Reply
  253. Honestly, unusual activity smells like an excuse to control locals. What if they’re hiding something way bigger than we think? 🤔

    Reply
  254. Why is everyone so hush-hush? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger than we think?

    Reply
  255. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Classic government silence, right?

    Reply
  256. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if authorities just want control, not safety? Feels like a power play!

    Reply
  257. Okay, but isn’t this just an excuse to privatize the river crossing? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for $$$ moves, not safety.

    Reply
  258. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as a reason to shut it down? Feels like a cover-up or some shady agenda.

    Reply
  259. Honestly, what if the “unusual activity” is just the DOC covering up some shady deal? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they say.

    Reply
  260. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to restrict access. What if it’s just about controlling locals rather than real danger?

    Reply
  261. Are we seriously just accepting unusual activity without questions? Feels like theyre hiding something way bigger than a random incident here.

    Reply
  262. Wait, are we seriously just gonna accept unusual activity as an excuse? Sounds like someones hiding something bigger here, no?

    Reply
  263. Wait, isn’t this just an excuse to restrict access and control locals? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up to me.

    Reply
  264. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the secrecy? Maybe authorities want to hide illegal stuff happening there?

    Reply
  265. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if the DOC just wants to control access and push tourists elsewhere? Fishy much?

    Reply
  266. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding some big corporate deal or land grab behind this shutdown?

    Reply
  267. So, who’s really behind this “unusual activity”? Feels like a cover-up to control access, not just safety. Anyone else suspicious?

    Reply
  268. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something way bigger. Why’s DOC so hush-hush? Feels like they’re hiding dirt.

    Reply
  269. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down the crossing. What if they just want control, not safety?

    Reply
  270. Unusual activity? Sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down. What if they’re hiding something bigger? Locals deserve real answers, not silence.

    Reply
  271. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here. Anyone else think so?

    Reply
  272. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up to me. What if this is just an excuse to restrict locals’ access for some shady reason?

    Reply
  273. Honestly, sounds like a cover-up. “Unusual activity” is vague—bet there’s something bigger the DOC’s hiding from us all!

    Reply
  274. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for some shady deal. Why else shut down a beloved spot without real explanation?

    Reply
  275. Seriously, unusual activity? Sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down for some hidden agenda. Anyone else smell a cover-up here?

    Reply
  276. Wait, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push tourism elsewhere? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something they don’t wanna admit.

    Reply
  277. Wait, is this just an excuse to control locals or hide something bigger? “Unusual activity” feels like a cover-up, not transparency.

    Reply
  278. Wait, isn’t this just an excuse to control access and push some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something sketchy.

    Reply
  279. Honestly, isn’t this just a cover-up? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something bigger. What are they really hiding from us?

    Reply
  280. Seriously, why all the hush-hush? Feels like theyre hiding something way bigger than just unusual activity. What’s really going on?

    Reply
  281. Seriously, unusual activity? Sounds like a cover-up to me. What if they’re hiding something bigger, like illegal smuggling or worse?

    Reply
  282. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like code for someone got caught doing something sketchy. Why the hush-hush? Feels fishy to me.

    Reply
  283. Honestly, sounds like a cover-up. “Unusual activity” is just code for something bigger they don’t want us knowing. Anyone else think so?

    Reply
  284. Honestly, isn’t this just an excuse to restrict access for some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds way too vague and suspicious!

    Reply
  285. Wait, “unusual activity”? Sounds like a lame excuse to control access. What if they just want to keep us out for some shady reason?

    Reply
  286. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why is DOC so secretive? Feels like theyre hiding serious issues!

    Reply
  287. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the hush? Feels like someones hiding serious trouble at that river!

    Reply
  288. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without proof? Feels like a convenient excuse to control locals. What’s really going on here?

    Reply
  289. Honestly, I bet this “unusual activity” is just an excuse to control locals. Who benefits from shutting down a peaceful spot anyway? Smells fishy.

    Reply
  290. Seriously, what if the “unusual activity” is just the DOC covering up some shady deal? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
  291. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something the DOC doesn’t want us knowing. What if it’s more serious than they admit?

    Reply
  292. Honestly, feels like they’re hiding something bigger—like a secret deal or illegal stuff. “Unusual activity” sounds way too vague and suspicious!

    Reply
  293. Honestly, isn’t this just another excuse to control access? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up to me. What are they hiding?

    Reply
  294. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they just wanna control locals or hide some shady deal? Smells fishy!

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is just their convenient excuse to dodge real questions and accountability.

      Reply
  295. Wait, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something fishy, not safety!

    Reply
  296. Wait, so theyre just shutting it down over unusual activity? Feels like a cover-up for something way bigger. What are they hiding?

    Reply
  297. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a lame cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? This silence screams conspiracy!

    Reply
  298. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without details? Sounds like a cover-up to me. What’s really going on there?

    Reply
  299. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the hush-hush? Feels like theyre hiding serious issues.

    Reply
  300. Seriously, why is everyone so quick to accept “unusual activity”? Could this just be a cover-up for some shady political move? Smells fishy!

    Reply
  301. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why shut it down without clear answers? Feels fishy to me.

    Reply
  302. Honestly, who even trusts these vague “unusual activity” excuses? Feels like they’re hiding something bigger, maybe political or just plain lazy. Thoughts?

    Reply
  303. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push locals out? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something else entirely. Thoughts?

    Reply
  304. Honestly, isn’t this just another excuse to control locals? “Unusual activity” sounds fishy—bet it’s about something way less innocent.

    Reply
  305. Honestly, unusual activity? Feels like a lame excuse to control locals. What if it’s just some boring bureaucratic drama? Thoughts?

    Reply
  306. So, anyone else think “unusual activity” is just a fancy way to hide some shady deal? Why the blackout on details? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  307. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cop-out excuse. What if they’re hiding bigger issues, like corruption or secret deals? Just saying.

    Reply
  308. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve real answers, not silence!

    Reply
    • Sometimes unusual activity is exactly what it sounds like—no conspiracy needed. Don’t jump to conclusions.

      Reply
  309. Wait, are we seriously blaming “unusual activity” without proof? Feels like just another excuse to restrict access for no good reason.

    Reply
    • Proof or not, restrictions always come with hidden agendas. Question everything, don’t just accept.

      Reply
  310. Unusual activity? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger. Bet it’s not just about safety—what if there’s a cover-up?

    Reply
  311. Okay, but isn’t this just a sneaky way for DOC to control locals? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for “we don’t want you here.”

    Reply
  312. Wait, “unusual activity”? Sounds like they’re covering up some secret government experiment or trying to hide something illegal. Anyone else think that?

    Reply
  313. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why’s DOC so hush-hush? Feels like they’re hiding mess, not protecting.

    Reply
  314. Wait, unusual activity? Sounds like a convenient excuse to restrict access. What if they just want to control locals for some hidden agenda?

    Reply
  315. Wait, isn’t this just an excuse to push some hidden agenda? ‘Unusual activity’ sounds like code for something bigger they don’t wanna admit.

    Reply
  316. Seriously, unusual activity? Feels like theyre hiding something way bigger—maybe some shady deals or secret smuggling. Anyone else think this stinks?

    Reply
  317. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like code for something shady. Why won’t they just come clean? Feels like a cover-up!

    Reply
  318. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for some shady deal. Why else shut down a beloved spot without clear answers? Suspicious much?

    Reply
    • Sometimes a “beloved spot” is just a front. Unusual activity might be exactly what it sounds like.

      Reply
  319. Honestly, isn’t this just an excuse to control locals? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something else. What are they hiding?

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is just vague enough to justify spying and suppressing dissent. Stay alert.

      Reply
  320. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for some shady deal or construction plans. Why the sudden silence? Feels fishy!

    Reply
  321. Wait, are we seriously just gonna accept unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here.

    Reply
  322. Honestly, sounds like the DOC’s just overreacting to some harmless fun. “Unusual activity” feels like code for “we don’t wanna deal.”

    Reply
  323. Honestly, what if this “unusual activity” is just an excuse to restrict access? Feels like Big Brother vibes, not safety concerns. Thoughts?

    Reply
  324. Seriously, who’s deciding what counts as “unusual activity”? Feels like an excuse to control locals more than actual safety concerns.

    Reply
  325. Are we seriously just gonna accept unusual activity as an excuse? Feels like the DOC’s hiding something way bigger here.

    Reply
  326. Wait, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something fishy, not safety.

    Reply
  327. Honestly, unusual activity? Sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why are authorities so secretive—what are they really hiding here?

    Reply
    • Sometimes unusual activity is just that—no grand conspiracy needed. Jumping to conclusions won’t help.

      Reply
  328. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” without questions? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here. What’s really up?

    Reply
  329. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for some shady deal. Why else shut down a beloved spot without clear answers? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  330. Are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger from us locals here!

    Reply
  331. Honestly, don’t you think the “unusual activity” excuse is just code for hiding some serious government screw-up? Feels like a cover-up to me.

    Reply
  332. Are we seriously just accepting unusual activity as an excuse? Feels more like theyre hiding something way bigger at that crossing.

    Reply
  333. Seriously, what if this “unusual activity” is just an excuse to control locals? Feels like a power move, not safety concerns. Thoughts?

    Reply
  334. Wait, are they seriously blaming “unusual activity” without details? Sounds like a cover-up to me. What are they hiding, really?

    Reply
  335. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down access. What if it’s just about control or money? Suspicious!

    Reply
  336. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut down access. What if they’re hiding something bigger, like corruption or a cover-up?

    Reply
  337. “Unusual activity”? Sounds like a lame excuse to restrict access. What if they’re just hiding some sketchy deal or environmental mess? Fishy!

    Reply
  338. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for some shady deal. Why else shut down a beloved crossing without clear answers?

    Reply
  339. So, unusual activity, huh? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger. Why the hush? Maybe locals should just cross anyway!

    Reply
    • Exactly! Silence usually means they’re covering up something serious. Crossing might be the only way to know.

      Reply
  340. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if the DOCs just scared of locals exposing something bigger? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  341. Okay, but what if this “unusual activity” is just the DOC covering up some shady deal? Feels like a classic distraction move, right?

    Reply
  342. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a convenient excuse. What if they’re just trying to control who crosses for some shady reason? Thoughts?

    Reply
    • Sounds like classic paranoia. Sometimes “unusual activity” is exactly what it says—no hidden agenda.

      Reply
  343. So what if the “unusual activity” is just the DOC trying to hide some shady deal? Bet locals know more than they’re saying!

    Reply
  344. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why shut down a beloved spot without clear answers? Fishy much?

    Reply
  345. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down. What if they just want control, not safety? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  346. Honestly, sounds like they’re hiding something bigger—maybe illegal stuff? “Unusual activity” feels like a cover-up, not just random weirdness.

    Reply
  347. Wait, are we seriously just going to accept “unusual activity” as an excuse? Sounds like someones hiding something way bigger here!

    Reply
  348. Wait, “unusual activity”? Sounds like a cover-up to me. What if they’re hiding something way bigger than we think? Fishy!

    Reply
  349. Honestly, I think the “unusual activity” is just an excuse to control locals. What if they’re hiding something bigger? Wake up, people!

    Reply
  350. Honestly, this “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. Why shut it down without clear answers? Feels like they’re hiding something bigger.

    Reply
  351. Wait, are we seriously calling this “unusual activity” without spilling the tea? Feels like the DOC’s hiding way more than they admit!

    Reply
  352. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding environmental damage or secret deals? Locals deserve real answers!

    Reply
  353. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the sudden hush? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
    • Exactly! “Unusual activity” is corporate-speak for “we messed up big time, don’t ask questions.”

      Reply
  354. Honestly, isn’t this just a sneaky way to push some hidden agenda? “Unusual activity” sounds like code for something else entirely.

    Reply
  355. Okay, but what if this “unusual activity” is just the DOC covering up their own screw-up? Sounds fishy, not mysterious.

    Reply
  356. Unusual activity? Sounds like they’re hiding something bigger. Maybe it’s not about safety but some secret deal locals aren’t told about. 🤔

    Reply
  357. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something shady. Why shut it down without clear answers? Feels fishy, tbh.

    Reply
  358. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Locals deserve the full story, no secrets!

    Reply
  359. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a convenient excuse to shut it down. What if they just want to control locals, not protect anyone?

    Reply
  360. So why is everyone so quick to trust the “unusual activity” excuse? Sounds like a cover-up to me. What’s really going on?

    Reply
    • Because people love a good conspiracy more than inconvenient truths. Question everything, not just the official story.

      Reply
  361. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the hush? Feels like they’re hiding serious issues, not just random noise.

    Reply
  362. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if authorities just want control, not safety? Feels fishier than the river itself!

    Reply
  363. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why shut down a beloved spot without clear answers? Suspicious much?

    Reply
  364. So, are they really shutting it down for safety or just hiding some shady deal? “Unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up to me!

    Reply
  365. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for some shady deal or corruption. Why else shut down a beloved spot without real answers?

    Reply
    • Or maybe it’s just bureaucracy at work—sometimes “unusual” means simple incompetence, not conspiracy.

      Reply
  366. Honestly, “unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding something way bigger? Feels like the locals deserve straight answers!

    Reply
  367. Seriously, “unusual activity” sounds like code for something shady. Why the hush-hush? Maybe locals know more than theyre letting on? 🤔

    Reply
  368. Wait, are we seriously pretending “unusual activity” isn’t just a cover-up for something way bigger? Feels like they’re hiding way more than they admit.

    Reply
  369. Seriously, why all the hush-hush? Feels like they’re hiding something bigger than just “unusual activity.” What if it’s not what they say?

    Reply
  370. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up for something bigger. Why the sudden silence? Feels like they’re hiding real issues here.

    Reply
  371. Wait, are we seriously just accepting “unusual activity” as an excuse? Sounds like someone’s hiding something way bigger, not just random noise.

    Reply
  372. Honestly, feels like they’re hiding something bigger—“unusual activity” sounds like a cover-up for some shady deal or secret project. Anyone else think so?

    Reply
  373. Honestly, unusual activity sounds like a cover-up. What if they’re hiding environmental damage or some shady deal? Locals deserve real answers!

    Reply
  374. Seriously, what if this “unusual activity” is just a cover-up for some shady deal? Locals deserve the full story, not vague mumbo jumbo.

    Reply
  375. Wait, are we seriously just gonna accept “unusual activity” as an excuse? Feels like they’re hiding something way bigger here, no?

    Reply
  376. Wait, so they just shut it down with vague “unusual activity”? Feels like they’re hiding something bigger. What if it’s not what they say?

    Reply
    • Exactly, “unusual activity” is classic corporate smoke screen. They’re definitely hiding way more than they admit.

      Reply
  377. I think DOC is a government public service organisation and as such are duty bound to release their documents, unlike cooperations and private organisation.
    Official Information Act 1982 the public have right to access reports, memos, letters and more held by govt organisations. Fact

    Reply
  378. Maybe more hard evidence of pre Maori civilisations have been found .Many sights found in the past , DOC has hid !

    Reply
  379. Please make conspiracy theories at least have the beginnings of being interesting. Mmm… – Trump has secret B2 bomber airforce base used to bomb Iran? Farming Moa’s already – Mc Moa burger? (but what sauce to put in it?) Chinese govt secret water bottling plant- rumbling is tunneling through to West Coast for shipping pickup……sort of thing.

    Reply
  380. Looking at the sign and the piece of plastic mesh leaves me thinking that a non-English speaker may not be inhibited from using the crossing.
    I wonder what they’d have to report when completing the traverse.
    Certainly might help solve all the conjecture.

    Reply
Leave a comment